KMID : 0613620210410010061
|
|
Health Social Welfare Review 2021 Volume.41 No. 1 p.61 ~ p.80
|
|
An International Comparison of Sickness Benefit Programs
|
|
Lim Seung-Ji
Lee Yong-Gab Lee Jung?Myun
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
In accordance with the recommendations of international organizations, most ISSA member countries have put in placesickness benefit programs, with Korea being an exception. The need for sickness benefits has grown since the eruption of the COVID-19 pandemic. This study compared health insurance systems and sickness benefit programs in all ISSA and OECD member countries, with a view to proposing a sickness benefit model suitable for Korea. Regardless of the type of their health insurance, most countries have in place sickness benefits that are provided through a contributory social insurance scheme?either a health insurance scheme or a separate sickness insurance program. Even in the case of a contributory sickness benefit scheme, the government and the employer are expected to pay, in accordance with ILO standards, more than 50% of benefit expenditures. In addition, most of the sickness benefit schemes cover all workers including the self-employed, while in paid sick leave programs in most countries, the priority is given to employees. Although the period of the sickness benefit varied across countries, the maximum period was 180 days or 360 days before receiving the pension, and the level of coverage was based on the ILO recommendation (50% to 70% of income).
|
|
KEYWORD
|
|
COVID-19, Sickness Benefit, Social Insurance, ISSA, OECD, ILO
|
|
FullTexts / Linksout information
|
|
|
|
Listed journal information
|
|
|
|